The Success or Failure of Popular Science?
The coming of the lawless one is according to the working of Satan, with all power, signs, and lying wonders, and with all unrighteous deception among those who perish, because they did not receive the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this reason God will send them strong delusion, that they should believe the lie, that they all may be condemned who did not believe the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness.
(2 Thessalonians 2:9-12) New King James Version
If you could get everyone, the whole world, to believe something which isn’t true would that be success or failure? If your goal is to delude everyone then it’s success. If your goal was to educate people so that they can evaluate facts and evidence and then deduce a logically certain conclusion, then it’s failure.
The “scientific fact” that the Earth orbits the sun is self-evident, right? No, it isn’t. The failure of popular science (SciPop) refers in part to our challenge (starting December 25, 2015) for anyone to provide prove of heliocentricity. No one has.
We don’t observe Earth orbiting the sun. That’s theoretical, not empirical. We observe the sun rise and set every day from our frame of reference on a stationary Earth. It’s empirical, not theoretical. Heliocentric and Geocentrospheric are two different frames of reference in the same cosmological system: they coexist. People today don’t seem to be able to grasp this concept.
Heliocentric (sun worship) or Geocentrospheric?
- IF you were on the Sun you’d be observing heliocentricity,
- SINCE you’re not, you’re on the Earth, you’re observing Geocentrosphericity.
The mathematical basis for the belief in heliocentricity comes from Kepler’s laws. However, the math doesn’t prove heliocentricity. The empirical part of Kepler’s laws is that the sun is at one focus of elliptical planetary orbits. What’s at the other focus? That’s where SciPop went off the rails.
There’s a lot of theory around the premise that the Earth orbits the sun, but all of it can be shown to be inductive, reductive circular reasoning. Heliocentricity isn’t a conclusion which can be deduced, it’s a premise which has to be induced. It’s the strong delusion.
The Success or Failure of Mainstream Science? – Navigation
| Section | Title | Scripture |
| 1 | Introduction | 2 Thessalonians 2:9-12 |
| 2 | Science and the New Ignorance | 1 John 5:4 |
| 3 | They Have no Understanding | Psalms 32:9 |
| 4 | Phases of Venus | 2 Peter 1:19 |
| 5 | Moons of Jupiter | Acts 14:12 |
| 6 | Retrograde Motion of Mars | Deuteronomy 4:19 |
| 7 | My Atlas of the Universe Miracle | Philippians 4:19 |
| 8 | If the World Hates You | John 15:18-19 |
| 9 | Many False Prophets Shall Rise | Matthew 24:11 |
| 10 | A Millstone Hanged About His Neck | Luke 17:12 |
| 11 | Not Every One | Matthew 7:21 |
| Salvation | Romans 10:9-10 |
July 21st – The Success or Failure of Mainstream Science?
The capacity for independent thought among the scientific community is so poor that no one has realized yet that there’s no proof of heliocentricity.
Not Every One
Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven.
(Matthew 7:21 ) NKJV
We experience a lot of hate on the Internet, mostly on Twitter but it comes through Facebook, Instagram and Linked-In too. We are very grateful for it. The types of “Christians,” who are wildly popular and accepted are the ones who want you to believe that there is no hell, and that everyone is going to heaven. They are the false prophets of whom Jesus was speaking. The response that I expect is the same that Jeremiah experienced:
This is between me and God, but I was saved by faith in Jesus Christ in July 1997, at 2339 JoMac Road, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. I was baptized at Lystra Road Baptist Church in Chatham County, North Carolina, on September 12th, 1999.
Thanks be to God. Today’s image is from here.
Matty (Headwind) 