Tag: peer review

Posted on

Peer Review

For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine, but according to their own desires, because they have itching ears, they will heap up for themselves teachers; and they will turn their ears away from the truth, and be turned aside to fables.

(2 Timothy 4:3-4) NKJV

We have considered the dubious nature of the Great Permian Contrivance. The Permian, and its supposed date millions of years ago, isn’t a testable hypothesis, so it’s not, technically, scientific.

Continue reading “Peer Review”
Posted on

Earth in Upheaval

Hardened lava flows around a volcano

Then Job answered and said, I know it is so of a truth: but how should man be just with God? If he will contend with him, he cannot answer him one of a thousand. He is wise in heart, and mighty in strength: who hath hardened himself against him, and hath prospered? Which removeth the mountains, and they know not: which overturneth them in his anger. Which shaketh the earth out of her place, and the pillars thereof tremble.

(Job 9:1-6) KJV

Earth in Upheaval is the name of a book by Immanuel Velikovsky which lays out his summary of the evidence for cataclysmic upheavals in the history of Earth.

Continue reading “Earth in Upheaval”
Posted on

Peer Review is Beyond Irrelevant

And do this, knowing the time, that now it is high time to awake out of sleep; for now our salvation is nearer than when we first believed.

(Romans 13:11) NKJV

We frequently say that we’re here to destroy the theoretical foundation of popular science (SciPop). This comes up on Twitter when someone suggests:

“Have your work peer reviewed and then I might take it seriously. “

– Atheist Science Troll
Continue reading “Peer Review is Beyond Irrelevant”
Posted on

The Narrative of Evolution

O Timothy! Guard what was committed to your trust, avoiding the profane and idle babblings and contradictions of what is falsely called knowledge—by professing it some have strayed concerning the faith. Grace be with you. Amen.

(1 Timothy 6:20-21) NKJV

The Peer Review driven narrative for the origin of humanity is that the Bible is wrong and that it took 4.6 billion years for primordial ooze to turn into humans through random chance. You can argue details but that’s it.

Continue reading “The Narrative of Evolution”
Posted on

Experimentation and Evolution

There is a man in your kingdom in whom is the Spirit of the Holy God. And in the days of your father, light and understanding and wisdom, like the wisdom of the gods, were found in him; and King Nebuchadnezzar your father—your father the king—made him chief of the magicians, astrologers, Chaldeans, and soothsayers.

(Daniel 5:11) NKJV

Popular science (SciPop) has been zealous in it’s pursuit of documentation for Evolution. The modern scientific method was honed at the same time that Cladistic Phylogenetic Analysis was being developed. The two grew up together like siblings.

Continue reading “Experimentation and Evolution”
Posted on

The Narrative of the Decay Constant

Planet earth on the second day as concentric layers of sediment around a gravitational singularity

Therefore, just as through one man sin entered the world, and death through sin, and thus death spread to all men, because all sinned –

(Romans 5:12) NKJV

The peer review narrative for Earth begins with the desire that the Bible is wrong and hell isn’t at the center. One way to do this is to have a timescale which is completely different to the one in the Bible.

Continue reading “The Narrative of the Decay Constant”
Posted on

The Role of the Decay Constant

Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.

(Genesis 3:16) KJV

If the theory of evolution is the centerpiece of the popular science narrative of godless existence (SciPop), then radiometric dating has been the pseudoscientific glue that held it together.

Continue reading “The Role of the Decay Constant”