Creation Theory Predictive Testable Hypothesis 10
Hell from beneath is moved for thee to meet thee at thy coming: it stirreth up the dead for thee, even all the chief ones of the earth; it hath raised up from their thrones all the kings of the nations.
(Isaiah 14:9) KJV
One of the main pillars in the theoretical foundation of the popular science (SciPop) is the decay constant. This is an assumption which is at the very heart of the experimental procedure that is used to get “dates,” from rocks that appear to support the SciPop narrative that the earth is billions of years old.
It’s impossible to prove that radioisotopes have decayed at a constant rate throughout history, since the ability to detect and measure radioactive decay is only about 120 years old. We have no data from before that time. This means that the hypothesis that nuclear decay has always been constant is untestable, therefore it’s unscientific.
When we look at the scientific rationale for why SciPop has chosen to believe in the decay rate, apart from the obvious reason: it’s a useful contrivance that gives SciPop what it wants, what we find is, for the most part, just circular reasoning.
Inductive Reductive Circular Reasoning
For instance: one rationale for believing in constant decay is based on the analysis of light from supernovas. Now, the circular reasoning here is that, in science, we have already chosen to believe that a supernova is an exploding star light years away, an explanation of the phenomenon that dovetails neatly with the narrative of godless existence. This is not even a testable hypothesis, and it certainly cannot be proven. The fact is that there are no light years and it’s really just an explosion in space somewhere in the Kuiper belt. So, given that science has a fictional understanding of what a supernova is, you will see from the following description that this is not, after all, a corroboration of the constant decay rate.
Supernovae are known to produce a large quantity of radioactive isotopes (Nomoto et al. 1997a, 1997b; Thielemann et al. 1998). These isotopes produce gamma rays with frequencies and fading rates that are predictable according to present decay rates. These predictions hold for supernova SN1987A, which is 169,000 light-years away (Knödlseder 2000). Therefore, radioactive decay rates were not significantly different 169,000 years ago. Present decay rates are likewise consistent with observations of the gamma rays and fading rates of supernova SN1991T, which is sixty million light-years away (Prantzos 1999), and with fading rate observations of supernovae billions of light-years away (Perlmutter et al. 1998).
– Talk Orogins Claim CF210
Arguing From Silence
For a fire is kindled in mine anger, and shall burn unto the lowest hell, and shall consume the earth with her increase, and set on fire the foundations of the mountains.
(Deuteronomy 32:22) KJV
Another reason for why SciPop has chosen to believe in a constant decay rate is based on the absence of an expected result. SciPop, for the most part, willfully misinterprets experimental results but at least there’s a result to misinterpret. The example above shows that real measurements of a phenomenon are used, they’re just used in a way that’s based on having already chosen to believe a specific result.
What I am getting at here is that, when the alternative is considered: a variable decay rate, SciPop anticipates that this would cause a result that we don’t observe, a negative inference, and this is taken as a positive proof of the hypothesis.
Radioactive decay at a rate fast enough to permit a young earth would have produced enough heat to melt the earth.
(Meert 2002). From Claim CF210
If you tried to do this in theology it would be called arguing from ignorance. Plus there’s another problem: it DID melt the Earth, the core.
Nuclear Decay Began at the Fall of Man
And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life;
(Genesis 3:17) KJV
When God cursed the earth the nuclear decay began. The reality of this is that God’s presence was the power that maintained all of matter in a stable condition. When God withdrew his physical presence from the Earth then this power was no longer available to maintain the creation and it began to decay. The process of physical aging and dying began for Adam, but the process also began for the Earth itself.
So why didn’t the surface of the earth turn into an ocean of lava? This is because of the mechanism of creation that we have come to understand in Matty’s Paradigm. On the second day of creation God created gravity and a spherical earth formed around it. This process meant that the vast majority of heavy metal elements, the ones that we now call “unstable,” were concentrated at the core. When radioactive decay began the core melted. We can make this one of our creation theory predictive testable hypotheses:
Predictive Testable Hypothesis 10
- IF nuclear decay has decreased exponentially,
- AND the initial burst of radiation caused the core of the Earth to melt,
- THEN heat from the core will cause material from the lower mantle to melt, fall into the core, and cause it to expand,
- AND expansion of the core will cause global warming,
- THEN this should be detectable and measurable.
Plate Tectonics
And unto Eber were born two sons: the name of one was Peleg; for in his days was the earth divided; and his brother’s name was Joktan.
(Genesis 10:25) KJV
Now, it may be possible to gauge the rate of expansion of hell by looking at key historical markers. The pillars of the Earth were originally based upon the solid core. At some point the core melted completely so that there was no longer a solid foundation for the pillars. This caused the crust and mantle to collapse. This event caused the tectonic plates to form.
The Himalayan mountains were formed when two sections of crust were thrust together, and the various deep ocean trenches formed when one section of crust was thrust under another. The Earth experienced radial shrinkage (its diameter decreased) as the plates collided and formed some of the major features that we see today. This event, which was when the continent of Pangaea broke apart, was after Babel, and the Bible even records it for us.
What this does for us is give an understanding of how the present biological diversity was distributed around the world. After Noah’s flood the animals dispersed and began to propagate. They spread around the world. Humanity decided to remain together and they built a city, Babel. God had intended for humans to spread all over the world and subdue it, but they weren’t doing it. He stepped in and confounded our language so that people were unable to communicate. This caused them to separate from each other and spread to the far corners of the world. Once this was accomplished the original super continent Pangaea broke apart and the tectonic plates formed in a cataclysmic event.
If this doesn’t scare you, I don’t know what will. Hell is expanding. It’s the cause of global warming. Science can’t do anything about it. Jesus Christ is the only way to escape.
Matty (Headwind) 