Deep in the Weeds

This is where I was going before I figured out how to simplify it…

This is for my reference purposes only, it is not current.

Over the last few weeks (it’s now September 2017) I’ve been able to expand very greatly on a simple idea that I had sometime before 2003 that the creative act on the second day of creation was the creation of gravity.

I have discussed this elsewhere and I will incorporate the idea into this present work, but this is just a brief summary to set the scene. The idea became that God created an instance of gravity (a singularity) which had a specific quantity and that caused the earth to be a specific mass. This is a direct challenge to the assumption of the gravitational constant, which is that gravity is proportional to mass. In a weird cosmic chicken-and-the-egg scenario we have now taken the opposite position: mass is proportional to gravity. It is important to realize that the gravitational constant is an assumption based on circumstantial evidence. The whole of Newtonian math and Einstein’s relativity are based on this assumption.

The creation of gravity caused two bodies to form, the earth and the firmament. The firmament is a sphere of rigid crystal at the edge of space. There is abundant evidence that it is real and present, but this evidence has been incorrectly interpreted. Part of this work will be to illustrate how the evidence available today supports the presence of the firmament. I will also make it clear that modern science is a narrative of godless existence which, by the process of peer review, selectively allows or disallows interpretations of evidence to ensure compliance with the accepted narrative. Peer review also tolerates blatant disregard for the scientific method and process when it produces a result that promotes the narrative of godless existence.

On the fourth day of creation God created the sun, moon and stars. There are two very important things to take away from this simple statement:

1. there is only one sun,
2. stars are like planets, bodies that reflect light (they don’t emit it)

This challenges the fundamental notion that is in universal acceptance today which is that stars are suns. Our sun is described as being a star. As far as science is concerned the words are synonymous. This notion has to be abandoned. It is not a testable hypothesis, so it is not scientific. The idea that stars are suns came from Galileo as a way to rationalize why he could not measure parallax. However, the use of stellar parallax as a way to prove that the earth is moving is merely circular reasoning, since it requires the assumption that the earth is moving.

The development of thought regarding gravity is to consider that, on the 4th day, God created an instance of gravity for the core of the sun that was specific to Hydrogen. This brings up the idea that gravity not only has quantity, but also frequency, which can be specific to a particular molecule.

On the sixth day God created Adam, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life so that he became a living soul. The human soul is a matter of great interest since, according to the Bible, it continues after the death of the body in one of two places, heaven or hell. The existence of hell is largely dismissed, even by the Christian community. However, by challenging the assumption of the gravitational constant, I can show that human souls exist and so does hell. For instance, science tells us that the earth is solid, or a mixture of solid and liquid, and uses the gravitational constant G and acceleration due to gravity g to calculate the mass of the earth. The mass of the earth is then used to calculate the mass of the sun and the other planets using the laws of gravitation and Kepler’s laws of planetary motion.

If the gravitational constant G is merely an assumption based on circumstantial evidence, and the earth is not solid as the Bible says, then the measured value for g has no relationship to the mass of the earth, or at least, it has a relationship that we don’t know, because the earth is not solid.

We also have to consider that if God created an instance of gravity for the foundation of the earth, and another for the core of the sun, then many other planetary bodies may also represent created instances of gravity. Not only that, but the human soul, which science stubbornly refuses to acknowledge because it can’t be detected, may also represent an instance of gravity. If the human soul is an instance of gravity that has a frequency specific to each individual, then it gives a mechanism for how our consciousness, personality, memories and experiences can exist as incorporeal (as in hell) or be transferred into another body (as in heaven). If each human soul is an instance of gravity then the gravitational component of the earth is being transferred from the surface to the core as people die who are lost in sin. Fluctuations in the rate at which souls are added to hell, in instances of mass deaths, may be the cause of gravitational waves. This gives us a predictive testable hypothesis for the existence of the human soul and hell, using gravitational waves.

If you’re not scared yet you probably should be.

I have been claiming that I have destroyed the theoretical foundation of modern science, and that I have taken out Galileo, Kepler, Newton and Einstein. Recent work has been focused on Newton and refuting the gravitational constant. One of the member of the Twitter community didn’t seem too happy that this recent work has been in podcast form and he told me to write it all down and call it Principia Mattymatica. That’s pretty catchy, so I thought I’d do a fairly detailed take down of Newton’s Principia.

Sir Isaac Newton begins his Principia Mathematica with a series of definitions, which are:

1. quantity of matter,
2. quantity of motion,
3. inertia,
4. impressed force,
5. centripetal force,
6. absolute quantity of centripetal force,
7. accelerative quantity of centripetal force,
8. motive quantity of centripetal force,

With the simple stuff out of the way he then tackles more conceptual ideas:

1. absolute, true and mathematical time,
2. absolute space,
3. place,
4. absolute motion,

In the discussion of absolute motion Newton discusses relative motion, and this is the first time that we are introduced to the idea that the earth is moving (p. 78). It is introduced in an off-handed and casual way, and it is clear that from Newton’s perspective, the matter is settled. There is a fascinating paragraph in this section (p.79) that appears to be an admission of the possibility of a firmament.

“But we may distinguish rest and motion, absolute and relative, one from another by their properties, causes and effects. It is a property of rest, that bodies really at rest do rest in respect to one another. And therefore as it is possible, that in the remote regions of the fixed stars, or perhaps far beyond them, that there may be some body absolutely at rest; but impossible to know, from the position of bodies to one another in our regions whether any of these do keep the same position to that remote body; it follows that absolute rest cannot be determined from the position of bodies in our regions.”

Another quote from this introduction demonstrates that Newton’s concept of the cosmos is in line with that of Galileo, which has deviated from Biblical teaching by incorporating the idea that the fixed stars are far distant bodies, such as suns similar to or larger than our own (p. 81).

“And therefore in their system who suppose that the heavens, revolving below the sphere of the fixed stars, carry the planets along with them; the several parts of those heavens, and the planets, which are indeed relatively at rest in their heavens, do yet really move.”

Newton admits that actual quantities, such as the mass of a planet, may not be known, but only the relative quantities of the mass of the planets may be calculated (p. 81):

“Wherefore relative quantities are not the quantities themselves, whose names they bear, but those sensible measures of them (either accurate or inaccurate), which are commonly used instead of the measured quantities themselves.”

This we can take as tacit admission that we haven’t measured anything at all, really, but we have only calculated relative proportions of cosmological bodies. It is interesting to realize that Newton was really the inventor of relativity, not Einstein. His paragraph continues:

“And if the meaning of words is to be determined by their use, then by the names time, space, place and motion, their measures are to be properly understood; and the expression will be unusual, and purely mathematical, if the measured quantities themselves are to be meant. Upon which account, they do strain the sacred writings, who there interpret those words for the measured quantities. Nor do those less defile the purity of mathematical and philosophical truths, who confound real quantities themselves with their relations and vulgar measures.”

At this point in Principia, Newton begins to lay out his Axioms, or Laws of Motion, so this is where I will describe what is about to happen in Principia Mattymatica.

It is clear that Newton believes that his mathematical work on the laws of motion “strain the sacred writings,” and he is obviously very aware that his work is dramatically opposed to Biblical teaching in many ways. However, I am going to show you that this is not because the Biblical teachings are inaccurate or wrong, but because all of Newton’s work is based on some specific assumptions that are no more than circumstantial evidence. Newton has made a choice to interpret his mathematical work in such a way as to be in opposition to what the Bible teaches, but this is a choice, it is not mandated by the subject matter.

Newton’s Choices

1. earth is moving,
2. planets and fixed stars have a different nature,
3. the Bible does not present an accurate portrayal of our solar system

Newton’s choices form the canvas on which he is going to paint his masterpiece. The paint he is using are the laws of motion which embody a very simple assumption, which I am going to show you is wrong.

Axioms, or Laws of Creation.

Newton lays out three laws of motion with which he is going to investigate the natural world and discover it’s Natural Philosophy. By defining these laws and their corollaries Newton is able to develop a mathematical system with which, it appears, we can subsequently investigate both the internal structure of the earth and the starry heavens. As such, it seems appropriate to me to select three key scriptures which will form the basis of three laws, and their corollaries, which will show that it is not actually possible to investigate either the internal structure of the earth or the starry heavens. With these three laws we will, however, be able to account for all physical evidence as popular science has done.

Law 1

And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.(Genesis 1:2)

At the time that the narrative of creation begins the state of the physical universe is described as without form, void, deep water. We can take this to mean:

1. the only physical matter was water.
2. there was nothing dissolved or suspended in it.
3. cohesion of the water molecules caused it to be one continuous body.
4. it had no fixed shape because there was no source of gravity.
5. the water had a surface and it existed in space.

Law 2

Whereupon are the foundations thereof fastened? or who laid the corner stone thereof; (Job 38:6)

God created the first instance of gravity at the beginning of the second day. The gravity caused the mass of water to assume a spherical shape. The instance of gravity had a specific quantity and frequency. The quantity of gravity caused the resultant earth to have a specific mass. The frequency of gravity caused a separation of types of molecules:

1. Type 1 sank towards the center of gravity and formed the earth.
2. Type 2 accumulated as a spherical shell near the surface of the water, which became the firmament.

From this we are to understand that mass is proportional to gravity, as opposed to the common belief that gravity is proportional to mass. As a result, the gravitational constant G is an assumption based on circumstantial evidence.

Law 3

And beside all this, between us and you there is a great gulf fixed: so that they which would pass from hence to you cannot; neither can they pass to us, that would come from thence. (Luke 16:26)

The earth is not solid, or a combination of solid and liquid as science teaches. There is a great gulf of empty space between the surface of the core (hell) and the lower mantle.

From this we are to understand that the acceleration due to gravity g is not relatable to the mass of the earth using its radius and G, or at least the relationship is not known. Common belief is that the mass of the earth can be calculated from the radius of the earth and knowing G and g, but this requires that there is no empty space inside the earth. This means that we do not actually know the mass of the earth, and since the mass of the earth is used to calculate the mass of the sun and other planets, we do not know them either.

Corollary I-VI

For each of our three laws we are going to have two Corollaries. There may be many more, but I’m going to follow the structure that Newton used in his Principia. He described 6 Corollaries.

Corollary I and II confirm the creative act of the first day, the creation of light and life, and confirm that it took place in a zero gravity environment. Corollary III and IV confirm the creation of gravity on the second day, and confirm that the internal structure of the earth is unknowable. Corollary V and VI confirm that the absolute structure of the heavens is unknowable, and that all Biblical prophecy, that is currently unfulfilled, can be fulfilled.

Corollary I

CMB.

Corollary II

Precambrian Fossils. Sulphur bacteria. Super size bacteria. Prototaxites.

Corollary III

The creation of the first instance of Gravity. The banded iron formations. The development of the earth on the 3rd day. A mountain that filled the whole earth. Implications for the structure of the earth and the existence of hell.

Corollary IV

The structure of the earth, hell, and global warming.

Corollary V

Geocentrophericity, Newton’s laws and Relativity. Mythological Heliocentric geometry. The structure of the Firmament. The creation of the sun, moon and stars on the fourth day. Crystalline firmament material. Mirrors in space, winds of sapphire and rubies. Exoplanets.

Corollary VI

Prophecy, the lifting up of Jerusalem and the stars shall fall like rain.

Scholium

Thus saith the LORD; If heaven above can be measured, and the foundations of the earth searched out beneath, I will also cast off all the seed of Israel for all that they have done, saith the LORD. (Jeremiah 31:37)

It is not possible to investigate with any certainty the internal structure of the earth, or in any way measure the physical dimensions of the heavens.