“Everyone must use honest weights and measures:
(Ezekiel 45:10) Good News Version
Hitchens’s razor isn’t a philosophical tenet which regulates the use of evidence, it’s proof of a failure to understand what evidence is and how it’s used. We all have exactly the same evidence. What you believe it’s evidence of is derived from your choice of paradigm. This is Matty’s Razor.
We all have the same evidence. Our choice of paradigm determines what we think it’s evidence of.
– Matty’s Razor
The clearest example is the stratigraphic column.
The Stratigraphic Column is evidence of…
- In mainstream science (SciPop) it’s used as evidence for:
- the Geological Timescale,
- a contrivance of circular reasoning which is the backbone of Darwinian evolution.
- It’s divided into sections like Cambrian, Silurian, Ordovician, Devonian etc.
- the Geological Timescale,
- In Matty’s Paradigm it’s evidence for:
- Gravity was created on the second day
- the core accretion model,
- Precambrian (Gravitian) fossils.
- the second day is the WHY? devotional for February.
- Noah’s flood,
- Cambrian-Quaternary (Noachian) fossils were deposited in Noah’s flood.
- Noah’s flood is the WHY? devotional for August.
- Gravity was created on the second day
Exactly the same evidence, two different meanings. The meaning isn’t derived from the evidence, the meaning is derived from the choice of paradigm.
When someone like Hitchens’s dismisses a person of faith for believing in Noah’s flood because there’s “no evidence,” and then uses Hitchens’s razor as their justification, they haven’t won the intellectual high ground they’re perpetrating epistemological abuse.
Hitchens’s Razor – Navigation
| Section | Title | Scripture |
| 1 | Hitchens’s Razor | Proverbs 16:18 |
| 2 | Epistemological Abuse | Ezekiel 45:10 |
| 3 | Primary or Secondary? | Isaiah 5:20 |
| 4 | The High Price of Epistemological Buffoonery | Luke 16:23 |
| 5 | The Fool has Said in his Heart | Psalms 53:1 |
| Salvation | Romans 10:9-10 |

July 24th – Hitchens’s Razor
Hitchens’s razor is epistemological sleight-of-hand which fails to distinguish justified belief from opinion.


