A sheep in wolf's clothing.
So we are even more confident of the message proclaimed by the prophets. You will do well to pay attention to it, because it is like a lamp shining in a dark place until the Day dawns and the light of the morning star shines in your hearts.
(2 Peter 1:19) Good News Translation
Any time someone uses the phases of Venus as proof of heliocentricity they’re demonstrating that their knowledge of the subject matter is at or below a superficial level.
Continue reading “Phases of Venus”
This article is sophomoric drivel with no scientific value at all. However it does contain a smoking gun quote which demonstrates the circular nature of stellar parallax.
“We already know what we’re looking for.”
Yep. if you assume heliocentricity you can use stellar parallax to confirm heliocentricity.
It is a prevailing belief that space flights are planned using a heliocentric model of our solar system, and therefore Geocentrosphericity is impossible. This is the worst kind of scientific superficiality possible.
Firstly, heliocentricity is a theoretical model of the empirical Geocentrospheric reality. As such they coexist but one is real and the other is imaginary.
Secondly, all space flights start on the earth and many of them end back here, they are inherently Geocentrospheric. All space missions are tracked and controlled from the earth so they are empirically Geocentrospheric.
To Him who made great lights, For His mercy endures forever—The sun to rule by day, For His mercy endures forever; The moon and stars to rule by night, For His mercy endures forever.
(Psalms 136:7-9) NKJV
Stellar parallax is used to “verify” that the Earth is moving but it’s dependent upon the A priori assumption that the Earth is moving. In case you weren’t sure, that’s circular reasoning.
Continue reading “Stellar Parallax”
Total: 1412
Bring all the tithes into the storehouse, That there may be food in My house, And try Me now in this,” Says the LORD of hosts, “If I will not open for you the windows of heaven And pour out for you such blessing That there will not be room enough to receive it.
(Malachi 3:10) NKJV
There has been an interesting discussion on Twitter today. I challenged the ASTs (atheist science trolls) with a way to get the proof of God that they have been demanding. I actually put it in terms of a testable hypothesis for the existence of God. The basis of the test is Malachi 3:10:
Continue reading “The Superficial Theology of Atheism”
Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage.
(Galatians 5:1) KJV
Cladistic phylogenetic analysis works by grouping species based on shared derived characteristics (synapomorphies). All of the members of a homologous group have a common ancestor. In this way it’s possible to develop a phylogenetic tree.
Continue reading “Primitive or Advanced?”
If I’m right, and the theoretical foundation of modern science is really nothing more than an alternative to the truth, this has some serious implications. Not the least of which is the role that the great minds of science have played throughout history. There are a few key individuals who made leaps of faith, and jumped some major gaps in logic with nothing more than their desire to overcome God.
They flew by the seat of their pants and did it so convincingly that their work is considered foundational to the development of mainstream thought.
They were wrong.
According to science the Earth is an insignificant speck that orbits another insignificant speck that drifts through a cosmos so vast that we are, for want of a better word, insignificant.
The Bible teaches us the exact opposite, that the Earth is the center of creation and that God, as omnicient and omnipresent as He is, is deeply concerned with the details of each of our lives. So concerned, in fact, that he took on human form and lived among us so that he could explain to us how we can live life to its fullest and then life for eternity in heaven.
What is real?
Is it even remotely possible that the explanation of our place in the universe, according to science, is really a false narrative of godless existence designed to make you reject the everlasting life that comes through faith in Jesus Christ?
Could it be true?
Do you even care?
No one can prove that God exists so what difference does it make?
Matty (Headwind) 