A sheep in wolf's clothing.
Your gold and silver is cankered; and the rust of them shall be a witness against you, and shall eat your flesh as it were fire. Ye have heaped treasure together for the last days.
( James 5:3 ) KJV
The actual significance of katioó is unknown, but for time being it serves as a positive result in what is now a predictive testable hypothesis. As such, it could be said that Kat Ion is Sophia Proton’s sidekick.
Your gold and silver is cankered; and the rust of them shall be a witness against you, and shall eat your flesh as it were fire. Ye have heaped treasure together for the last days.
(James 5:3) KJV
In the original Sophia Proton post we speculated that the use of Greek words in science to describe the chemical and physical properties of matter and energy isn’t an accident, but has been done by the power of the Holy Spirit to encode the fundamental physics of the universe into the words of scripture.
Continue reading “Kat Ion”
But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up. Seeing then that all these things shall be dissolved, what manner of persons ought ye to be in all holy conversation and godliness, Looking for and hasting unto the coming of the day of God, wherein the heavens being on fire shall be dissolved, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat? Nevertheless we, according to his promise, look for new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness.
(2 Peter 3:10-13) KJV
Stoixeíon is translated as rudiments, principles or elements. It’s the origin of the word stoichiometry, a term with specific meaning in physics and chemistry. The periodic table of elements is an example of stoichiometry.
Continue reading “One of a row, a letter (of the alphabet): στοιχεῖα – stoixeion”
Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.
(Colossians 2:8) KJV
The periodic table of elements is an example of stoichiometry. Considering the use of the word stoicheia in Colossians 2:8, we can do some simple deduction based on Genesis 1:2 and resolve the Holy Trinity as a chemical formula.
Continue reading “Stoicheia tou Kosmou”
(For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal, but mighty through God to the pulling down of strong holds;) Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ;
( 2 Corinthians 10:4-5 )
Kepler’s Laws are the weakest point in the popular science paradigm.
It’s almost as if he did it on purpose.
Kepler’s Laws and their pseudoscientific explanation are a small thermal exhaust port in the Death Star of popular science.
The cosmological model in Matty’s Paradigm is both empirical (directly observable) and meets the requirements of Kepler’s laws which, surprise, surprise, the current heliocentric model does not.
Who is a wise man and endued with knowledge among you? let him shew out of a good conversation his works with meekness of wisdom. But if ye have bitter envying and strife in your hearts, glory not, and lie not against the truth. This wisdom descendeth not from above, but is earthly, sensual, devilish. For where envying and strife is, there is confusion and every evil work. But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, and easy to be intreated, full of mercy and good fruits, without partiality, and without hypocrisy. And the fruit of righteousness is sown in peace of them that make peace.
(James 3:13-18) KJV
Preparing sermons is something that shouldn’t be taken lightly. On one hand, if you’re a real, Holy Spirit called preacher, you’re already prepared. If you find yourself in front of a group of people you start preaching.
Continue reading “Introducing Sophia Proton”
It took a thousand years and all kinds of speculation and wrangling to come up with actual proof that the earth is rotating in an orbit around the sun. That’s the rhetoric you are supposed to believe.
Supposedly, the aberration of starlight is the experimental evidence that gave the heliocentric theory a solid scientific footing.
A common analogy is to consider the apparent direction of falling rain. If rain is falling vertically in the frame of reference of a person standing still, then to a person moving forwards the rain will appear to arrive at an angle, requiring the moving observer to tilt their umbrella forwards. The faster the observer moves, the more tilt is needed.
Wikipedia
The issue is quite simply resolved as a matter of relative motion. However, the popular science explanation of the phenomenon is an example of an inductive rationalization of evidence to fit a premise, it is not a conclusion which may be deduced and it doesn’t take into account other possible causes.
it doesn’t take into account either gravitational lensing or gravitational time dilation.
Gravitational lensing is usually thought of in terms of the observed bending of light around a gravitational body such as the sun. This is Einstein’s Mirage, where circumstantial evidence is taken as proof of relativity: Einstein’s prediction that gravity bends space. However, we don’t observe the bending of space, we observe the bending of light. The largest source of gravity in the universe is the singularity at the center of the earth. How would gravitational lensing affect the path of light if the effect is stronger the closer to the earth the light gets?
Gravitational time dilation is the phenomenon that time passes more slowly the closer you are to a source of gravity. The only empirical frame of reference we have to measure this from is the earth. It’s something we have to correct for to maintain the accuracy of the GPS Navigation system.
At an orbital radius of 26,541 km above the center of the earth time passes faster on GPS satellites by 38,640 nanoseconds per day.
– GPS Time Dilation
If light speed is constant, but time isn’t, then it should appear that light travels faster the closer it gets to earth because time passes more slowly. Theoretically, light should speed up as it falls to earth. This gives us a way to resolve our aberration of light conundrum, but it also raises the question: is the speed of light variable?
Let’s remind ourselves of our definition of gravity:
Gravity (A) is a field emitted from a created instance (a singularity) which causes a body to have attractive force (p) proportional to its mass and inversely proportional to the square of its distance from the source (pG).
G is the gravitational constant. This is a general physical law derived from empirical observations by using deduction.
– Matty’s Law of Biblical Gravitation
If gravity is affecting time in a way that is proportional to the distance from the source then we can expand our definition.
Gravitational time dilation is caused by a field emitted from the singularity at the center of the Earth which causes time to pass more quickly in proportion to the square of the distance from the source.
– Gravitational Time Dilation, definition
I thought I’d throw in the inverse square law just to be on the safe side. If light is also affected because of our perception of the passage of time then we need to expand the definition again.
If time passes more slowly the closer we are to a source of gravity, but light speed is constant, we will perceive light speed as variable because the passage of time is changing. If we can’t measure any variation in the speed of light, but we can measure variation in the passage of time, then light speed is variable and proportional to gravity.
This becomes very similar to how relative motion works. We can’t actually prove if the earth is stationary and the cosmos rotates or if the cosmos is stationary and the earth rotates. It’s dependent on our frame of reference.
The relationships we have to resolve are between gravity, time and light.
So let’s think about time. Gravity was created on the 2nd day but time was already passing. Or was it? Before creation began God existed as a Trinity which included the body of water known as the deep. Presumably time existed but was it passing in a linear sequence as we observe it? On the 1st day God said let there be light. Light existed before gravity. We have deduced that light was generated by the process of nucleosynthesis, which is a strictly sequential ordering of matter and energy based on using Hydrogen atoms to construct the periodic table. Time was definitely passing and it was linear.
A day passed. The time it took to complete the process was the amount of time that God chose to call a day. God created gravity on the 2nd day, firstly to begin the process of separating light from darkness, but we have now deduced a secondary purpose: to permanently establish the length of day as directly proportional to the gravitation field he created. Gravity maintains consistency in the passage of time on earth.
Wherefore laying aside all malice, and all guile, and hypocrisies, and envies, and all evil speakings, As newborn babes, desire the sincere milk of the word, that ye may grow thereby: If so be ye have tasted that the Lord is gracious.
(1 Peter 2:1-3) KJV
If a baby needs milk to survive before it can tolerate solid food, has this been patterned after the processes which took place on the first and second days of the creation of the universe?
Continue reading “The Milk of the Word”
Continue reading “Cutting the Link between Mass and Gravity”There was a certain rich man, which was clothed in purple and fine linen, and fared sumptuously every day: And there was a certain beggar named Lazarus, which was laid at his gate, full of sores, And desiring to be fed with the crumbs which fell from the rich man’s table: moreover the dogs came and licked his sores. And it came to pass, that the beggar died, and was carried by the angels into Abraham’s bosom: the rich man also died, and was buried; And in hell he lift up his eyes, being in torments, and seeth Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom. And he cried and said, Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus, that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool my tongue; for I am tormented in this flame. But Abraham said, Son, remember that thou in thy lifetime receivedst thy good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things: but now he is comforted, and thou art tormented. And beside all this, between us and you there is a great gulf fixed: so that they which would pass from hence to you cannot; neither can they pass to us, that would come from thence. Then he said, I pray thee therefore, father, that thou wouldest send him to my father’s house: For I have five brethren; that he may testify unto them, lest they also come into this place of torment. Abraham saith unto him, They have Moses and the prophets; let them hear them. And he said, Nay, father Abraham: but if one went unto them from the dead, they will repent. And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead.
(Luke 16:19-31) KJV
This is a direct copy of a SciPop or news article preserved here because things on the internet have a bad habit of disappearing when you try to find them again. Full credit is given to the original authors and the source.
– Matty
One of the first things that Physics students learn when they study radioactivity is the idea of the half-life.
Continue reading “Radioactive Decay Rates May not be Constant After All”
Matty (Headwind) 