Thus saith the LORD; If heaven above can be measured, and the foundations of the earth searched out beneath, I will also cast off all the seed of Israel for all that they have done, saith the LORD.(Jeremiah 31:37) KJV
We can’t measure the distance to stars and we don’t know what they are. All that we have are measurements of luminosity and spectra. The values that popular science (SciPop) call distances are derived using geometry.
The thing is, the measurements of luminosity and spectra don’t tell us if the light is being reflected or emitted by the stellar bodies. The decision to believe that stars are distant suns and galaxies which emit light is one of the leaps of faith in the SciPop paradigm.
Unfortunately, geometry gives distances according to our choice of paradigm. Distances derived by assuming heliocentricity are much greater than distances derived by assuming Geocentrosphericity. As a result, in the Geocentrospheric system the stars are much closer than they are in SciPop, which also means that they’re substantially less massive.
The majority of stars are pieces of crystalline firmament material (CFM) which reflect light. This gives us a testable hypothesis because if the stars are reflecting light, not emitting it, then we ought to be able to detect this with the advanced technology that we have available today.
Predictive Testable Hypothesis 30
- IF stars are crystalline firmament material (CFM),
- AND they’re reflecting sunlight,
- THEN we should be able to detect this using modern telescopes.
These objects are detectable with our modern technology and we look at them every night. What happened in Astronomy was that even though the Kuiper and asteroid belts have been detected it was necessary to induce the narrative that they’re invisible, and therefore the stars which we observe are massive bodies, suns and galaxies, much further away. It’s simpler to deduce that the visible stars, Kuiper and asteroid belts are the same thing.