For the creation was subjected to futility, not willingly, but because of him who subjected it, in hope that the creation itself will be set free from its bondage to corruption and obtain the freedom of the glory of the children of God.(Romans 8:20-21) ESV
The fourth axiom of popular science (SciPop) is nuclear decay has always been constant. It’s wishful thinking, a way to induce a rationalization of radiometric data to make rocks look older than they really are.
SciPop has been built on a few ephemeral strands of wispy logic and one of them is the arbitrary decision to believe that nuclear decay has always been constant. The Decay Constant is a major deity in the atheist pantheon assigned to defend the fourth axiom. We need to know why it’s necessary.
Is the Earth 4.6 billion years old or 6,000? The difference is the decay constant. It was conceived by Earnest Rutherford as a way to give a solid experimental backbone to the theory of evolution. It it real? Or is it an inductive rationalization of the premise of an ancient Earth and, by extension, godless existence?
The Decay Constant – Navigation
|2||The Role of the Decay Constant||Genesis 3:16|
|3||Evidence for the Decay Constant||2 Peter 3:8|
|4||Experimentation for the Decay Constant||Leviticus 19:36|
|5||The Narrative of the Decay Constant||Romans 5:12|
Please support us.