A sheep in wolf's clothing.
How can we prove the Geocentrospheric model?
If one day the sky could be measured
(Jeremiah 31:37) Good News Translation
and the foundations of the earth explored,
only then would he reject the people of Israel
because of all they have done.
The Lord has spoken.
Sir Edwin Hubble was one of the first to suggest that the apparent redshift of stellar objects is caused by the Doppler effect as the universe expands and the stars become further and further away.
Continue reading “The Hubble Constant”
Gravity is strongest at the core of the earth. That’s what we can measure. It’s empirical.
Things fall to earth. It’s measured by dropping things. It gives us the field value for acceleration due to gravity, small g, which is proportional to the square of the distance from the center of the earth.
The practical effect is seen in the way that gravity affects the passage of time. The closer you are to the center of the earth, the slower time passes. This is profoundly significant because the satellites in the GPS Navigation system have clocks which have to be corrected in order to maintain the accuracy of the system.
At an orbital radius of 26,541 km above the center of the earth time passes faster on GPS satellites by 38,640 nanoseconds per day.
– GPS Time Dilation
We aren’t on the sun and can’t make these kind of measurements there.
The mass of the sun is not known and the value used in popular science is derived by assuming heliocentricity. As we have gone to great lengths to point out, heliocentricity can’t be proven.
Gravity is both inherently and empirically Geocentrospheric.
This is not proof of heliocentricity.
Presented as proof of heliocentricity.
Seasons happen on the earth. They are inherently Geocentrospheric.
Weather happens on earth. It is inherently Geocentrospheric.
Seasons happen because the sun has a helical spiral orbit that progresses toward the South pole for six months, then back towards the North pole for six months. This is empirically observed as the sun changes position in the sky every day throughout the course of one year. In fact, the year is measured as the number of days that it takes to complete this cycle.
The Greek word for the sun is Helios, meaning, helical.
Since this entire annual cycle is observed from the earth is it empirically Geocentrospheric.
In the heliocentric system this phenomenon has to be accounted for by saying that the earth rotates daily on an axis tilted by 23.5°. This is theoretical, it is not observed.
This is not proof of heliocentricity.
Presented as proof of heliocentricity.
Eclipses of the sun or moon are observed from the earth. The phenomenon is caused by an alignment of the sun, moon and earth, or the sun, earth and moon. They are predicted using historical observations that were also made from the earth. The phenomenon is both inherently and empirically Geocentrospheric.
This is not proof of heliocentricity.
Presented as proof of heliocentricity.
The ISS orbits the earth, so it is inherently Geocentrospheric. The eclipse was observed from the earth, so it is empirically Geocentrospheric.
This is not proof of heliocentricity.
The Coriolis effect is always stated as proof that the earth is rotating. However, all it proves is that something is rotating, not what. In Heliocentricity the earth rotates every day. In the Geocentrospheric system the cosmos rotates every day. There is no observable difference between the two. Since the practical effect of the Coriolis force effect is primarily its effect on weather patterns and the movement of shipping, the effect can be caused by either interpretation of this phenomenon.
There may be other causes for the observed effect which is referred to as the Coriolis Effect, such as circulation in the magma flow in the core of the earth, part of the explanation we have deduced for GDC below.
The gravitational field of the universe is emitted from the core of the earth. This is the singularity which was created on the 2nd day. If the mode of action of gravity is the Higgs Boson, then the core of the earth is emitting the stream of Higgs Bosons which binds the universe together.
We can picture this as a silver cord connecting the core of the earth to the sun. Now imagine silver cords connecting the core of the earth to every planet, every asteroid, every comet, every star, every unidentified object in the heavens. Every particle and body in the universe is connected to the core of the earth by a silver cord.
Imagine that the cosmos is rotating. That shouldn’t be hard because it is an empirical observation. The earth is stationary but the universe with all of its planetary and stellar bodies orbits the earth everyday. The network of silver cords has to be rotating too.
Now imagine that the core of the earth is a ball of molten radioactive slag. Hell. It is interacting with this network of Higgs Boson silver cords. It is a fluid body and so over time, because of the influence of the moving network of silver cords, it begins to rotate. Eventually it is rotating at the same speed as the cosmos. Hell contains iron so it has a magnetic field. Motion in a magnetic field produces an electric charge. Hell is the source of earth’s magnetic field and its rotation causes its electric charge.
The surface of the earth is stationary, but the heavens and hell have daily rotation.
How could we test this?
It is not possible to prove that the earth is rotating. Experimental results which have formerly been used as a way to prove that the earth has daily rotation are examples of GDE on a stationary earth.
It took a thousand years and all kinds of speculation and wrangling to come up with actual proof that the earth is rotating in an orbit around the sun. That’s the rhetoric you are supposed to believe.
Supposedly, the aberration of starlight is the experimental evidence that gave the heliocentric theory a solid scientific footing.
A common analogy is to consider the apparent direction of falling rain. If rain is falling vertically in the frame of reference of a person standing still, then to a person moving forwards the rain will appear to arrive at an angle, requiring the moving observer to tilt their umbrella forwards. The faster the observer moves, the more tilt is needed.
Wikipedia
The issue is quite simply resolved as a matter of relative motion. However, the popular science explanation of the phenomenon is an example of an inductive rationalization of evidence to fit a premise, it is not a conclusion which may be deduced and it doesn’t take into account other possible causes.
it doesn’t take into account either gravitational lensing or gravitational time dilation.
Gravitational lensing is usually thought of in terms of the observed bending of light around a gravitational body such as the sun. This is Einstein’s Mirage, where circumstantial evidence is taken as proof of relativity: Einstein’s prediction that gravity bends space. However, we don’t observe the bending of space, we observe the bending of light. The largest source of gravity in the universe is the singularity at the center of the earth. How would gravitational lensing affect the path of light if the effect is stronger the closer to the earth the light gets?
Gravitational time dilation is the phenomenon that time passes more slowly the closer you are to a source of gravity. The only empirical frame of reference we have to measure this from is the earth. It’s something we have to correct for to maintain the accuracy of the GPS Navigation system.
At an orbital radius of 26,541 km above the center of the earth time passes faster on GPS satellites by 38,640 nanoseconds per day.
– GPS Time Dilation
If light speed is constant, but time isn’t, then it should appear that light travels faster the closer it gets to earth because time passes more slowly. Theoretically, light should speed up as it falls to earth. This gives us a way to resolve our aberration of light conundrum, but it also raises the question: is the speed of light variable?
Let’s remind ourselves of our definition of gravity:
Gravity (A) is a field emitted from a created instance (a singularity) which causes a body to have attractive force (p) proportional to its mass and inversely proportional to the square of its distance from the source (pG).
G is the gravitational constant. This is a general physical law derived from empirical observations by using deduction.
– Matty’s Law of Biblical Gravitation
If gravity is affecting time in a way that is proportional to the distance from the source then we can expand our definition.
Gravitational time dilation is caused by a field emitted from the singularity at the center of the Earth which causes time to pass more quickly in proportion to the square of the distance from the source.
– Gravitational Time Dilation, definition
I thought I’d throw in the inverse square law just to be on the safe side. If light is also affected because of our perception of the passage of time then we need to expand the definition again.
If time passes more slowly the closer we are to a source of gravity, but light speed is constant, we will perceive light speed as variable because the passage of time is changing. If we can’t measure any variation in the speed of light, but we can measure variation in the passage of time, then light speed is variable and proportional to gravity.
This becomes very similar to how relative motion works. We can’t actually prove if the earth is stationary and the cosmos rotates or if the cosmos is stationary and the earth rotates. It’s dependent on our frame of reference.
The relationships we have to resolve are between gravity, time and light.
So let’s think about time. Gravity was created on the 2nd day but time was already passing. Or was it? Before creation began God existed as a Trinity which included the body of water known as the deep. Presumably time existed but was it passing in a linear sequence as we observe it? On the 1st day God said let there be light. Light existed before gravity. We have deduced that light was generated by the process of nucleosynthesis, which is a strictly sequential ordering of matter and energy based on using Hydrogen atoms to construct the periodic table. Time was definitely passing and it was linear.
A day passed. The time it took to complete the process was the amount of time that God chose to call a day. God created gravity on the 2nd day, firstly to begin the process of separating light from darkness, but we have now deduced a secondary purpose: to permanently establish the length of day as directly proportional to the gravitation field he created. Gravity maintains consistency in the passage of time on earth.
Stellar spectroscopy conveniently ignores the possibility that stars are reflecting sunlight and incorporates itself into one of the most intricate examples of circular reasoning ever devised.
Continue reading “Stellar Spectroscopy”
For no prophecy was ever produced by the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit.
(2 Peter 1:21) English Standard Version
Any time that someone uses the transit of Venus as proof of heliocentricity they’re demonstrating that their knowledge of the subject matter is at or below a superficial level.
Continue reading “Transit of Venus”
And take heed, lest you lift your eyes to heaven, and when you see the sun, the moon, and the stars, all the host of heaven, you feel driven to worship them and serve them, which the LORD your God has given to all the peoples under the whole heaven as a heritage.
(Deuteronomy 4:19) NKJV
Retrograde motion is often described as a “big problem” for the Geocentrospheric model, but this exposes a failure by those who believe this to comprehend two concepts frame of reference and relative motion.
Continue reading “Retrograde Motion”
Matty (Headwind) 