A sheep in wolf's clothing.
How can we prove the Geocentrospheric model?
And they called Barnabas, Jupiter; and Paul, Mercurius, because he was the chief speaker.
(Acts 14:12) NKJV
Any time someone uses the moons of Jupiter as proof of heliocentricity they’re demonstrating that their knowledge of the subject matter is at or below a superficial level.
Continue reading “Moons of Jupiter”
So we are even more confident of the message proclaimed by the prophets. You will do well to pay attention to it, because it is like a lamp shining in a dark place until the Day dawns and the light of the morning star shines in your hearts.
(2 Peter 1:19) Good News Translation
Any time someone uses the phases of Venus as proof of heliocentricity they’re demonstrating that their knowledge of the subject matter is at or below a superficial level.
Continue reading “Phases of Venus”
It is a prevailing belief that space flights are planned using a heliocentric model of our solar system, and therefore Geocentrosphericity is impossible. This is the worst kind of scientific superficiality possible.
Firstly, heliocentricity is a theoretical model of the empirical Geocentrospheric reality. As such they coexist but one is real and the other is imaginary.
Secondly, all space flights start on the earth and many of them end back here, they are inherently Geocentrospheric. All space missions are tracked and controlled from the earth so they are empirically Geocentrospheric.
To Him who made great lights, For His mercy endures forever—The sun to rule by day, For His mercy endures forever; The moon and stars to rule by night, For His mercy endures forever.
(Psalms 136:7-9) NKJV
Stellar parallax is used to “verify” that the Earth is moving but it’s dependent upon the A priori assumption that the Earth is moving. In case you weren’t sure, that’s circular reasoning.
Continue reading “Stellar Parallax”
Matty (Headwind) 