Occam’s Twitter

Hypothesis 36

Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; Who put darkness for light, and light for darkness; Who put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!

(Isaiah 5:20) NKJV

Occam’s razor used to crop up frequently in the discussion on Twitter as if the atheist science trolls (ASTs) were appealing to a deity. As such it’s listed as a major deity in the atheist pantheon.

Since we’ve begun pointing out the elemental flaws in the value of Occam’s razor, and shown how it disproves both heliocentricity and the origin of species by evolution this gives us a predictive testable hypothesis:

Predictive Testable Hypothesis 36

As you may expect the ASTs have been backpedaling quite hard. This is now the prevailing attitude regarding Occam’s razor:

“Occam is a philosophical tenet, not scientific. Science doesn’t defer and call something true because it’s simple. It’s about prioritizing effort.”

– Backpedaling Trolls

Where did you come from?
1March 9th – God Planted a Garden
2July 23rd – Occam’s Razor
– navigate back to where you came from.

%d bloggers like this: