Hypothesis 36

Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; Who put darkness for light, and light for darkness; Who put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!

(Isaiah 5:20) NKJV

Occam’s razor used to crop up frequently in the discussion on Twitter as if the atheist science trolls (ASTs) were appealing to a deity. As such it’s listed as a major deity in the atheist pantheon.

Since we’ve begun pointing out the elemental flaws in the value of Occam’s razor, and shown how it disproves both heliocentricity and the origin of species by evolution this gives us a predictive testable hypothesis:

Predictive Testable Hypothesis 36

As you may expect the ASTs have been backpedaling quite hard. This is now the prevailing attitude regarding Occam’s razor:

“Occam is a philosophical tenet, not scientific. Science doesn’t defer and call something true because it’s simple. It’s about prioritizing effort.”

– Backpedaling Trolls

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: