A sheep in wolf's clothing.
O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen.
( 1 Timothy 6:20-21 ) KJV
We have identified 5 leaps of faith in the theoretical foundation of popular science (SciPop). The scientific community considers these to be axioms but they are assumptions based on circumstantial evidence.
God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.
( John 4:24 ) KJV
The scientific method is a philosophical contrivance designed to make finding the truth impossible. In a twist of irony, the scientific method may be used to demonstrate that the scientific method is a farce.
Enter by the narrow gate; for wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and there are many who go in by it. Because narrow is the gate and difficult is the way which leads to life, and there are few who find it.
(Matthew 7:13-14) NKJV
Occam’s Razor is a problem-solving principle attributed to William of Ockham (c. 1287–1347), who was an English Franciscan friar and scholastic philosopher and theologian. The principle can be interpreted as stating:
Continue reading “July 23rd”
Him that is weak in the faith receive ye, but not to doubtful disputations.
(Romans 14:1) KJV
If we propose Matty’s Paradigm as an alternative to the popular science paradigm (SciPop) then it would be a good idea to make sure that we know what a paradigm is.
Continue reading “What’s a Paradigm?”
And count the patience of our Lord as salvation, just as our beloved brother Paul also wrote to you according to the wisdom given him, as he does in all his letters when he speaks in them of these matters. There are some things in them that are hard to understand, which the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they do the other Scriptures.
(2 Peter 3:15-16) ESV
We’re going to pin down a way to refer to two major opposing ideologies. You’ve heard them referred to as science vs. religion, science vs. faith, fact vs. faith for example.
Continue reading “January 19th”
Then said he unto them, Therefore every scribe which is instructed unto the kingdom of heaven is like unto a man that is an householder, which bringeth forth out of his treasure things new and old.
(Matthew 13:52) KJV
The attractive force of a body which we can measure isn’t a property of the body itself, it’s imparted to it because it’s in a gravitational field. This leads to a new definition for gravity which is axiomatic.
Continue reading “A New Definition For Gravity”
It took 2 years, 20K followers, 100K Tweets, for me to completely dismantle the theoretical foundation of modern science down to the gravitational constant.
As a result, my @matty_lawrence account and the #HellExpanding hashtag have been censored.
I think I must have hit a nerve.
So here’s a funny thing…
@Twitter is censoring my @matty_lawrence account and the #HellExpanding hashtag.
The timing of this is very interesting, coming as it does right when I have dug my way down to the very heart of the theoretical foundation of modern science: the gravitational constant.
The gravitational constant gives science a way to deny the existence of Hell and the possibility of the fulfillment of Biblical prophesy such as the stars falling to earth.
Being censored reminds me of what Jesus said: “and ye shall be hated of all nations for my name’s sake.” (Matthew 24:9)
Interesting times to be sure.
Newton thought that he was smarter than God. Unfortunately it appears that his peers did too from the amount of fawning drivel that is plastered all over the preface to the Principia.
Continue reading “What Utter Drivel”
And take heed, lest you lift your eyes to heaven, and when you see the sun, the moon, and the stars, all the host of heaven, you feel driven to worship them and serve them, which the LORD your God has given to all the peoples under the whole heaven as a heritage.
(Deuteronomy 4:19) NKJV
Retrograde motion is often described as a “big problem” for the Geocentrospheric model, but this exposes a failure by those who believe this to comprehend two concepts frame of reference and relative motion.
Continue reading “Retrograde Motion”
Matty (Headwind) 