Beginning the End
So he replied, “This means, then, that every teacher of the Law who becomes a disciple in the Kingdom of heaven is like a homeowner who takes new and old things out of his storage room.”(Matthew 13:52) Good News Translation
Assuming heliocentricity (Galileo’s bluff) causes the calculated distance to stars to seem greater than it is, because it’s derived from geometry with a base which is 2 astronomic units (AU) wide.
We’re making a bold claim that stars aren’t distant suns and galaxies. That’s another part of Galileo’s bluff. The stars are fragments, and swirls of fragments, of reflective rock in the Kuiper Belt. We refer to it as unknown luminous material (ULM) but we believe that most of it is crystalline firmament material (CFM).
We all have the same evidence. Our choice of paradigm determines what we think it’s evidence of.– Matty’s Razor
If this is the case then, with today’s advanced telescopes, we would expect to see evidence of it. We do. However, the evidence has been collected, interpreted and synthesized into THE NARRATIVE of heliocentricity (the Star Trek universe). It’s what you call mainstream science (SciPop) which is in the hands of people who want the Star Trek universe to be real, Trekkies.
It’s important to realize that what masquerades as scientific evidence isn’t evidence. It is an interpretation of evidence which has been tailored to fit THE NARRATIVE, in this case, Star Trek. Technically speaking scientific evidence is a secondary source. We need to look at the primary sources of evidence, before the Trekkies put their spin on it.
The evidence that we have are measurements of luminosity and spectra. That’s it. We can’t measure the distance to stars. The values that SciPop calls distances are derived by using geometry. Unfortunately, geometry gives distances which are derived from your choice of paradigm. Distances derived by assuming heliocentricity are much greater than distances derived by assuming Geocentrosphericity.
SciPop makes up explanations of phenomena based on the paradigm that it has defined. This is induction, not deduction. More accurately, it’s inductive, reductive circular reasoning. This means that a minute speck of light (a star) is considered to be a distant sun or galaxy according to the usage of words, not because the distance to it or its size have been measured. Sir Isaac Newton was familiar with this problem.
The Meaning of Words
You can call a speck of light a galaxy then use the definition to define its parameters without knowing the parameters.– Sir Isaac Newton, paraphrased
It could justifiably be said that Sir Isaac Newton taught us how to fudge data so that we could concoct the Star Trek universe. Just saying.
Counsel in the heart of man is like deep water; but a man of understanding will draw it out.(Proverbs 20:5) KJV
Let’s get back to reality. If the stars are fragments of CFM in the Kuiper Belt then they must be highly polished like the surface of broken glass. They would reflect light like a mirror. This is a predictive testable hypothesis. It’s an experimental finding too.
If confirmed, the shiny new worlds may help astronomers better understand how strange planets known as hot Jupiters are created.
Planets orbiting other stars are running out of ways to hide. For the first time, astronomers have used reflected starlight to tease out the possible presence of 60 large, roasted worlds. As those planets traipse around their stars, they act like large alien mirrors and briefly bounce a bit of extra starlight toward Earth, causing a small but measurable increase in their systems’ brightness.– National Geographic
Well, well, well, we just found stars which are reflected sunlight. Is this a new thing? No. It’s not new. Technology has advanced to the point that it’s impossible to use it to obscure the truth: stars are reflecting the light of the sun.
- IF stars are crystalline firmament material (CFM),
- AND they’re reflecting sunlight,
- THEN we should be able to detect this using modern telescopes.
The purpose of creation is to bring about the permanent physical separation of light from darkness, day from night, good from evil.– The Purpose of Creation
Fact or Fiction?
Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.(2 Timothy 3:7) KJV
We must be careful not to accuse SciPop of being a vast global conspiracy to conceal the truth. SciPop can’t deny the truth because SciPop has never known the truth. The people who work in SciPop aren’t lying, they genuinely believe in what they’re doing. The subtlety of the delusion is sublime.
All observations are incorporated into it’s existing narrative: Star Trek. The general population is so familiar with Star Trek that when SciPop comes out with a headline which has featured as the plot of a Star Trek episode, people can relate to it, it’s accepted, it’s science.
When theoretical physics comes up with a new idea it’s not accepted into the Peer Reviewed science lore until it has been the basis for the plot for a Star Trek episode. They go hand-in-hand.
Oh, this means that there aren’t any exoplanets. The stars of heaven shall fall to the earth.
- Call upon the name of Jesus Christ,
- believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead,
- confess your sin.
Beginning the End – Navigation
|1||A Multitude of Rubies||Matthew 13:52|
|Stellar Parallax||Psalms 136:7-9|
|Matty’s Parallax||Exodus 20:4|
|2||The Strong Delusion is Faltering||2 Thessalonians 2:9-12|
|A Huge Diamond in Space||Jeremiah 17:1|
|Giant Mirrors in Space||1 Corinthians 13:12|
|Rubies and Sapphires||Proverbs 20:15|
|Hypothesis 30||Jeremiah 31:37|
Read through the Bible in a year
|Reading plan||April 6|
|Linear||2 Kings 4-6|
We need your financial help but Mattymatica isn’t a religious organization, charity or new age cult.
If you need to belong somewhere, find a local church. If you’d like to help, please consider donating.