Up to this word they listened to him. Then they raised their voices and said, “Away with such a fellow from the earth! For he should not be allowed to live.”(Acts 22:22) ESV
Relative motion is a difficult concept to teach most people. They’re convinced that the success of space missions and the ability to land a space craft on a comet proves heliocentricity.
It doesn’t. All it proves is that we can accurately predict the relative position of planetary bodies using a theoretical heliocentric model. Their relative motion is a different issue.
Atheist science trolls (ASTs) love to bring up things like Cassini’s or Voyager’s flight path and insist that it’s proof of heliocentricity.
Their logic, that the if heliocentric concept was used to plan successful space fights then the Geocentrospheric model is impossible, is like saying 2+2=4, therefore 4 has to be the product of 2+2, you can’t make 4 any other way.
Atheist Science Troll Logic
- THEREFORE, 3+1=4 is impossible.
- A heliocentric model is used to plan space flights,
- THEREFORE Geocentrosphericity is impossible.
The Geocentrospheric model can’t be impossible, we observe the cosmos from the earth and it’s working fine: we live in a full-size Geocentrospheric model. What ASTs fail to grasp is that there are any number of models that could be made with which we could plan successful space flights. The existence of one does not negate the existence of another.
The Internal Structure of Earth and Size of the Cosmos are Unknowable