There is One Glory of the Sun

There is one glory of the sun, and another glory of the moon, and another glory of the stars; for star differs from star in glory.

(1 Corinthians 15:41) ESV

We can take the experimental confirmation of Einstein’s prediction of gravitational lensing to deduce that the sun is a source of gravity.

Gravity was created on the second day. The first ever gravitational singularity was created in the midst of the deep. At that time the universe became spherical. This is why space is curved. If the sun is a source of gravity then the singularity at the center of the Earth isn’t the only one that God created.

The Earth formed as concentric spherical layers of sediment deposited around a gravitation singularity. At the outer edge of the deep layers of crystalline composition formed: the firmament. Open space formed below the firmament as the Earth condensed and contracted.

The stars were formed on the fourth day from the inner layers of the firmament. As such, the stars are a wide variety of pieces and fragments of crystalline firmament material (CFM). They reflect the light of the sun.

So what’s the sun? Because it clearly isn’t CFM? Our Biblical law of gravity tells us that gravitational attraction is a property imparted to a body because of a gravitational field. The gravitational attraction is proportional to the mass of the body. This is non-specific regarding the nature of the body or what it’s made of. The sun is composed mostly of Hydrogen. Why? Why did all of the free Hydrogen in the universe accumulate into a ball? The fact that the sun is spherical and that it has a unique composition tells us that there’s something special about the sun.

We can now speculate that gravity can be tuned to specific frequencies in order to affect the composition of the body which forms. In the case of the sun, the gravitational singularity at its core is tuned to the specific frequency of Hydrogen.

2 Replies to “There is One Glory of the Sun”

    1. It looks like an attempt to rationalize the existence of God from within the popular science paradigm. It’s really time to move beyond that because the Bible describes its own paradigm.
      Strobel’s tagline is “A journalist investigates scientific evidence that points towards God.”
      There are a couple of problems with this approach which are based on failing to understand what evidence is and how it’s used.
      Evidence is neutral, it doesn’t point, and we all have the same evidence regardless of what we believe about science or the Bible.
      Any time someone refers to “scientific evidence” they’re referring to an interpretation of evidence which has been induced to fit the popular science narrative, rather than to the evidence on which the interpretation has been based.
      I appreciate his effort, and your support too, but I think it’s time to push through the current status quo where the parameters of what is “scientific” has been dictated by atheist intellectual elites (peer review).
      We have to take a step back and examine primary sources of evidence for ourselves and it will be seen that the truth about our creator God is self-evident, as is clearly stated in Romans 1:20.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: